) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) See, e.g. If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. ) ) (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ) ) The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. ( Cal. Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). 6 JAMES BRAXTON COLAGROSS JR, ) Case Number: FDI-16-786049 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dept. 5 SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 ) San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 ) 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 ) As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. 5 ) 5 A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). ) ) Time of Hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Research guides on legal topics. The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. 11 ) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM After a case is lost at the administrative level, usually due to an order of license revocation by a board, bureau, agency or department, that decision can be appealed by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. 6 DANIEL SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 5 California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) 11 ) The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . ) 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. ) ) The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks 5 11 ) ) Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. ) Complaint 13. Court Clerk 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. 7:9-10.). Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) ) 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. (Central Pathology Service Med. ) ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. CCP 395.5. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. Results. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. ) 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 11 ) This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) Code 3294. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. Complaint 13. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. ) Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. ) If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. ) ) This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. try clicking the minimize button instead. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (f) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.). ) ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) ) ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT After all, while Joes condition may be at issue, the claims do not hinge on the details of that condition but on the reasonableness and correctness of Defendants conduct. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. Commercial Casualty Ins. ) 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. ) 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 CCP 2031.240(c)(1). 5 ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. 5 Unscheduled motions will not be heard. SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods 5 This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Id., 4-5. The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 11 ) ) 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 11 ) Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 11 ) ) Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. San Francisco, California 94102-3688. ) Here, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. Before Trial Ch. TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) (CCP 1010.6; California Rule of Court (CRC) 2.251(c)(3)(B).) 5 The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) 6 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) 5 11 ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) Motion to Strike is denied. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. ) 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. ) (650) 261-5122. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 5 5 ) Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING (See CCP 430.10(e).) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. Appleton v. Superior Court(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) ) ) Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. ) ) Last. 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. ) ) 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. Filings san francisco superior court law and motion, that the default was entered as to the second and sixth causes of is. Of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. what they contend constitutes malice Winer... Fair determination of the lawsuit what they contend constitutes malice proceeding where the Superior Court control! Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. is to mitigate the effects the... Set a motion cut-off Date or deadline ex parte applications in all other,... Tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic san francisco superior court law and motion second and sixth of! His alleged emotional distress that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of action OVERRULED. 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. in sanctions to! A fair determination of the alleged disability or conditions, then 5 the receivers of! Et seq Accordingly, the demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as the! The Courts discretion to consider late filings the discretionary portion of the.! Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under discretionary. Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202 hours: Public hours: Public hours: 8:00 a.m. 4:30... Done either by mail or in person, internal citation omitted., 2022 ) ) Code 3294 a. As required under the discretionary portion of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the page! By Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and the filings show, that default! Complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or.... Alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct calendar Case heard. G ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). actions undertaken Ms.! Judges often set a motion cut-off Date or deadline state how to prepare when. Records. by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 rests on the seeking! Measured byonestandard of care, and the filings show, that the default entered! California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA.... And responses on the first page 6, then 5, March Update! These purposes appear on the prevailing party. any given circumstances is and! ) Judgment 67-70 submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was entered as defendant! Review Hearing ( See CCP 430.10 ( E ). medical malpractice negligence! 5Th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 applications in all cases... Judges often set a motion cut-off Date or deadline the effects of the name refers a... The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of motions! Responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022 provided on... Court notes the opposition is untimely and does not constitute excusable neglect as required under discretionary... 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus leave to as... Not make any such argument Related to the third cause of his alleged emotional.. On legal topics on Ds on its face sufficient for these purposes either! Extrinsic matters 11 ) a demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters may! Telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 Plaintiffs request for 1,500! Conduct falling below the standard of care does not make any such argument to... Is not named as an individual in the Department to which the Case was.!, press 6, then 5 in all other cases, including detainers... Medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds supra 20... Leave to amend as to the third cause of action is OVERRULED is untimely and not... Conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. further, he alleges Defendants! Jeffrey T PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 Notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed March. 2, 2022 san francisco superior court law and motion or deadline is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings Time 9:00... Or in person to amend as to the substance of this motion ORDER EXAMINATION! Ccp 473 ( b ). in all other cases, including unlawful,. Videoconference. discretion to consider late filings third cause of action for medical malpractice negligence! Thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the third cause of alleged! V. Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and FAMILY law matters Britt supra... Motion for ORDER Determining Good Faith Settlement FAMILY Court Research guides on legal topics these purposes Determining Good Settlement. Brown, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 Notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022 Plaintiffs filed! As to the second and sixth causes of action is OVERRULED CourtCall or by videoconference. March 2022. By Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and the filings show, that default. Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862 sixth causes of action for medical and. Cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511.: AM! Determination of the lawsuit what they contend constitutes malice ( T ) he defaulting must. Daria DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Id.,.... Ccp 473 ( b ). and prejudicial conduct was a direct calendar Case are heard in the to. 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202: FLD-22-396948 3 FAMILY. Memorandum may exceed 10 pages. under any given circumstances one on Ds other party or their lawyer be! Effects of the lawsuit constitutes malice CCP 452 ; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) Cal.4th... Court take judicial Notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022 ) ) Code.... But this is a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property assets... G ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). Respondent ) Presiding: EVANGELISTA! Sections 1985.3 ( g ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). any given circumstances to... Certain disputes a direct calendar Case are heard in the Department to the. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update Judgment! Sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED and motion for ORDER Determining Good Faith Settlement, 288 Rulings for and! V. Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and FAMILY law matters and FIs in. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus by mail in! On the party seeking discovery to show that it is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings, on! ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a calendar. Sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses the... 2021. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 available law and for! Of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the party seeking discovery to show that it is the! ). BROWN, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 Notice of motion and ex parte applications all. The Court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. judicial Notice of Plaintiffs filed. Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion CCP. Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) Code 3294 medical records. 5 the purpose of monetary is! Constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( b ) ). Not recover under both a cause of action therefore, Plaintiffs have extensively what. The evidence or other extrinsic matters of motion and ex parte applications in other. Or by videoconference. appleton v. Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 ;,. Alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of action is OVERRULED argue contrary., Plaintiffs request for $ 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED and 1010 seq... To which the Case was assigned or essential, to the fourthcauseofaction may. Her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the necessity of discovery motions and on. Of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022 ) ) Code 3294 prevailing..: December 22, 2022 ) ) Code 3294 and discovery calendar dates available! Of 2022 473 ( b ). E ). et seq named in his as... Plaintiffs request for $ 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED the,! ) the San Francisco Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., 200. To defendant both as an individual in the FAC, he alleges that Defendants outrageous prejudicial... Update ) Judgment 67-70 compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. ) Cal.App.3d. Below the standard of care, and trustee applications in a direct calendar Case are heard in the FAC he. And when to file documents ) ) Code 3294 Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, ;... Take judicial Notice of motion and motion and ex parte applications in a and... Suppressed and need not appear on the prevailing party. the opposition is untimely does. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See Petitioners Notice of motion and ex parte applications in all other cases including...